CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 36X170 vs HE 900 A

W 36X170 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HE 900 A is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 10946.6 cm³ against 10800 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.4%. They weigh essentially the same, 253 kg/m and 252 kg/m. W 36X170 is deeper, 919.5 mm against 890 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 36X170
W
HE 900 A
HE
Difference
Mass253 kg/m252 kg/m+0.4%
Depth919.5 mm890 mm+3.3%
Width304.8 mm300 mm+1.6%
Web thickness17.3 mm16 mm+8.1%
Flange thickness27.9 mm30 mm-7.0%
Area322.6 cm²320 cm²+0.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)437,043 cm⁴422,000 cm⁴+3.6%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)10,946.6 cm³10,800 cm³+1.4%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)9,520.9 cm³9,480 cm³+0.4%
Second moment, minor (Iz)13,319 cm⁴13,600 cm⁴-2.1%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,373.2 cm³1,410 cm³-2.6%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.43 cm6.5 cm-1.1%
Torsion constant (It)628.5 cm⁴749 cm⁴-16.1%

W 36X170 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HE 900 A to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 900 A.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 36X170 has the larger second moment of area: 437,043 cm⁴ against 422,000 cm⁴, a difference of 3.6%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (43.3 against 42.9 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 36X170 has a plastic modulus of 10946.6 cm³ and HE 900 A has 10800 cm³, a difference of only 1.4% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: W 36X170 is 253 kg/m and HE 900 A is 252 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 900 A gives 10800 cm³ of plastic modulus and 422,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 10946.6 cm³ and 437,043 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 36X170, with a second moment of area of 437,043 cm⁴ against 422,000 cm⁴ (3.6% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 914×305×253 vs HE 900 AUB 914×305×253 vs W 36X170W 36X170 vs H-900x300x16x28-243HE 900 A vs H-900x300x16x28-243
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…