CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 914×305×253 vs HE 900 A

UB 914×305×253 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); HE 900 A is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 10900 cm³ against 10800 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.9%. They weigh essentially the same, 253.4 kg/m and 252 kg/m. UB 914×305×253 is deeper, 918.4 mm against 890 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 914×305×253
UB
HE 900 A
HE
Difference
Mass253.4 kg/m252 kg/m+0.6%
Depth918.4 mm890 mm+3.2%
Width305.5 mm300 mm+1.8%
Web thickness17.3 mm16 mm+8.1%
Flange thickness27.9 mm30 mm-7.0%
Area323 cm²320 cm²+0.9%
Second moment, major (Iy)436,000 cm⁴422,000 cm⁴+3.3%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)10,900 cm³10,800 cm³+0.9%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)9,500 cm³9,480 cm³+0.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)13,300 cm⁴13,600 cm⁴-2.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,370 cm³1,410 cm³-2.8%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.42 cm6.5 cm-1.2%
Torsion constant (It)626 cm⁴749 cm⁴-16.4%

UB 914×305×253 to BS EN 10365:2017; HE 900 A to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 900 A.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 914×305×253 has the larger second moment of area: 436,000 cm⁴ against 422,000 cm⁴, a difference of 3.3%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (43.0 against 42.9 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 914×305×253 has a plastic modulus of 10900 cm³ and HE 900 A has 10800 cm³, a difference of only 0.9% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 914×305×253 is 253.4 kg/m and HE 900 A is 252 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 900 A gives 10800 cm³ of plastic modulus and 422,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 10900 cm³ and 436,000 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 914×305×253, with a second moment of area of 436,000 cm⁴ against 422,000 cm⁴ (3.3% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 914×305×253 vs W 36X170UB 914×305×253 vs H-900x300x16x28-243W 36X170 vs HE 900 AHE 900 A vs H-900x300x16x28-243
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…