CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 40X167 vs HE 1000 x 249

W 40X167 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HE 1000 x 249 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 11356.2 cm³ against 11400 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.4%. They weigh essentially the same, 248.5 kg/m and 249 kg/m. Both are about 980 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 40X167
W
HE 1000 x 249
HE
Difference
Mass248.5 kg/m249 kg/m-0.2%
Depth980.4 mm980 mmsame
Width299.7 mm300 mm-0.1%
Web thickness16.5 mm16.5 mmsame
Flange thickness26.2 mm26 mm+0.8%
Area318.1 cm²317 cm²+0.3%
Second moment, major (Iy)482,828 cm⁴481,000 cm⁴+0.4%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)11,356.2 cm³11,400 cm³-0.4%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)9,832.2 cm³9,820 cm³+0.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)11,779 cm⁴11,800 cm⁴-0.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,245.4 cm³1,240 cm³+0.4%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.1 cm6.09 cm+0.2%
Torsion constant (It)582.7 cm⁴582 cm⁴+0.1%

W 40X167 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HE 1000 x 249 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 1000 x 249.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 40X167 has the larger second moment of area: 482,828 cm⁴ against 481,000 cm⁴, a difference of 0.4%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (45.7 against 45.8 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 40X167 has a plastic modulus of 11356.2 cm³ and HE 1000 x 249 has 11400 cm³, a difference of only 0.4% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: W 40X167 is 248.5 kg/m and HE 1000 x 249 is 249 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 1000 x 249 gives 11400 cm³ of plastic modulus and 481,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 11356.2 cm³ and 482,828 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 40X167, with a second moment of area of 482,828 cm⁴ against 481,000 cm⁴ (0.4% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 1016×305×249 vs HE 1000 x 249UB 1016×305×249 vs W 40X167
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…