CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 1016×305×249 vs HE 1000 x 249

UB 1016×305×249 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); HE 1000 x 249 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 11300 cm³ against 11400 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.9%. They weigh essentially the same, 248.7 kg/m and 249 kg/m. Both are about 980 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 1016×305×249
UB
HE 1000 x 249
HE
Difference
Mass248.7 kg/m249 kg/m-0.1%
Depth980.1 mm980 mmsame
Width300 mm300 mmsame
Web thickness16.5 mm16.5 mmsame
Flange thickness26 mm26 mmsame
Area317 cm²317 cm²same
Second moment, major (Iy)481,000 cm⁴481,000 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)11,300 cm³11,400 cm³-0.9%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)9,820 cm³9,820 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)11,800 cm⁴11,800 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,240 cm³1,240 cm³same
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.09 cm6.09 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)582 cm⁴582 cm⁴same

UB 1016×305×249 to BS EN 10365:2017; HE 1000 x 249 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 1000 x 249.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, HE 1000 x 249 has the larger second moment of area: 481,000 cm⁴ against 481,000 cm⁴, a difference of 0.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (45.4 against 45.8 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 1016×305×249 has a plastic modulus of 11300 cm³ and HE 1000 x 249 has 11400 cm³, a difference of only 0.9% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 1016×305×249 is 248.7 kg/m and HE 1000 x 249 is 249 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 1000 x 249 gives 11400 cm³ of plastic modulus and 481,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 11300 cm³ and 481,000 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

HE 1000 x 249, with a second moment of area of 481,000 cm⁴ against 481,000 cm⁴ (0.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 1016×305×249 vs W 40X167W 40X167 vs HE 1000 x 249
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…