CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 40X183 vs HE 1000 A

W 40X183 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HE 1000 A is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 12683.6 cm³ against 12800 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.9%. They weigh essentially the same, 272.3 kg/m and 272 kg/m. Both are about 990 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 40X183
W
HE 1000 A
HE
Difference
Mass272.3 kg/m272 kg/m+0.1%
Depth990.6 mm990 mm+0.1%
Width299.7 mm300 mm-0.1%
Web thickness16.5 mm16.5 mmsame
Flange thickness30.5 mm31 mm-1.6%
Area343.9 cm²347 cm²-0.9%
Second moment, major (Iy)549,425 cm⁴554,000 cm⁴-0.8%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)12,683.6 cm³12,800 cm³-0.9%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)11,061.3 cm³11,200 cm³-1.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)13,777 cm⁴14,000 cm⁴-1.6%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,447 cm³1,470 cm³-1.6%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.32 cm6.35 cm-0.5%
Torsion constant (It)803.3 cm⁴835 cm⁴-3.8%

W 40X183 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HE 1000 A to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 1000 A.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, HE 1000 A has the larger second moment of area: 554,000 cm⁴ against 549,425 cm⁴, a difference of 0.8%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (46.6 against 47.1 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 40X183 has a plastic modulus of 12683.6 cm³ and HE 1000 A has 12800 cm³, a difference of only 0.9% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: W 40X183 is 272.3 kg/m and HE 1000 A is 272 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 1000 A gives 12800 cm³ of plastic modulus and 554,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 12683.6 cm³ and 549,425 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

HE 1000 A, with a second moment of area of 554,000 cm⁴ against 549,425 cm⁴ (0.8% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 1016×305×272 vs HE 1000 AUB 1016×305×272 vs W 40X183
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…