CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 1016×305×272 vs HE 1000 A

UB 1016×305×272 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); HE 1000 A is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 12800 cm³ against 12800 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.0%. They weigh essentially the same, 272.3 kg/m and 272 kg/m. Both are about 990 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 1016×305×272
UB
HE 1000 A
HE
Difference
Mass272.3 kg/m272 kg/m+0.1%
Depth990.1 mm990 mmsame
Width300 mm300 mmsame
Web thickness16.5 mm16.5 mmsame
Flange thickness31 mm31 mmsame
Area347 cm²347 cm²same
Second moment, major (Iy)554,000 cm⁴554,000 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)12,800 cm³12,800 cm³same
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)11,200 cm³11,200 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)14,000 cm⁴14,000 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,470 cm³1,470 cm³same
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.35 cm6.35 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)835 cm⁴835 cm⁴same

UB 1016×305×272 to BS EN 10365:2017; HE 1000 A to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 1000 A.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, HE 1000 A has the larger second moment of area: 554,000 cm⁴ against 554,000 cm⁴, a difference of 0.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (47.0 against 47.1 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 1016×305×272 has a plastic modulus of 12800 cm³ and HE 1000 A has 12800 cm³, a difference of only 0.0% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 1016×305×272 is 272.3 kg/m and HE 1000 A is 272 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 1000 A gives 12800 cm³ of plastic modulus and 554,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 12800 cm³ and 554,000 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

HE 1000 A, with a second moment of area of 554,000 cm⁴ against 554,000 cm⁴ (0.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 1016×305×272 vs W 40X183W 40X183 vs HE 1000 A
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…