CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 40X199 vs UB 1016×305×314

W 40X199 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; UB 1016×305×314 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). UB 1016×305×314 carries more bending: 14800 cm³ of plastic modulus against 14240.4 cm³, 3.8% more. W 40X199 is the lighter of the two at 296.1 kg/m against 314.3 kg/m, a saving of 5.8% on steel weight. Both are about 991 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 40X199
W
UB 1016×305×314
UB
Difference
Mass296.1 kg/m314.3 kg/m-5.8%
Depth983 mm999.9 mm-1.7%
Width401.3 mm300 mm+33.8%
Web thickness16.5 mm19.1 mm-13.6%
Flange thickness27.2 mm35.9 mm-24.2%
Area379.4 cm²400 cm²-5.2%
Second moment, major (Iy)620,185 cm⁴644,000 cm⁴-3.7%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)14,240.4 cm³14,800 cm³-3.8%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)12,618 cm³12,900 cm³-2.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)28,928 cm⁴16,200 cm⁴+78.6%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)2,245 cm³1,710 cm³+31.3%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)8.76 cm6.37 cm+37.5%
Torsion constant (It)761.7 cm⁴1,260 cm⁴-39.5%

W 40X199 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; UB 1016×305×314 to BS EN 10365:2017. Difference is expressed relative to UB 1016×305×314.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 1016×305×314 has the larger second moment of area: 644,000 cm⁴ against 620,185 cm⁴, a difference of 3.7%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 40X199 is the more efficient section: 48.1 against 47.1 cm³ per kg/m, 2.1% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 40X199 has 2245 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 1710 cm³, 31.3% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and UB to BS EN 10365:2017; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 5.8% weight.

In short, UB 1016×305×314 is the stronger section and W 40X199 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

UB 1016×305×314 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 14800 cm³ against 14240.4 cm³ - 3.8% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

W 40X199 at 296.1 kg/m, against 314.3 kg/m for the other - a saving of 5.8%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: UB 1016×305×314 gives 14800 cm³ of plastic modulus and 644,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 14240.4 cm³ and 620,185 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and BS EN 10365:2017), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 1016×305×314, with a second moment of area of 644,000 cm⁴ against 620,185 cm⁴ (3.7% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 1016×305×314 vs HE 1000 BUB 1016×305×314 vs W 40X211W 40X199 vs HE 1000 B
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…