CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 1016×305×314 vs HE 1000 B

UB 1016×305×314 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); HE 1000 B is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 14800 cm³ against 14900 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.7%. They weigh essentially the same, 314.3 kg/m and 314 kg/m. Both are about 1000 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 1016×305×314
UB
HE 1000 B
HE
Difference
Mass314.3 kg/m314 kg/m+0.1%
Depth999.9 mm1000 mmsame
Width300 mm300 mmsame
Web thickness19.1 mm19 mm+0.5%
Flange thickness35.9 mm36 mm-0.3%
Area400 cm²400 cm²same
Second moment, major (Iy)644,000 cm⁴645,000 cm⁴-0.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)14,800 cm³14,900 cm³-0.7%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)12,900 cm³12,900 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)16,200 cm⁴16,300 cm⁴-0.6%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,710 cm³1,720 cm³-0.6%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.37 cm6.38 cm-0.2%
Torsion constant (It)1,260 cm⁴1,270 cm⁴-0.8%

UB 1016×305×314 to BS EN 10365:2017; HE 1000 B to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 1000 B.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, HE 1000 B has the larger second moment of area: 645,000 cm⁴ against 644,000 cm⁴, a difference of 0.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (47.1 against 47.5 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 1016×305×314 has a plastic modulus of 14800 cm³ and HE 1000 B has 14900 cm³, a difference of only 0.7% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 1016×305×314 is 314.3 kg/m and HE 1000 B is 314 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 1000 B gives 14900 cm³ of plastic modulus and 645,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 14800 cm³ and 644,000 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

HE 1000 B, with a second moment of area of 645,000 cm⁴ against 644,000 cm⁴ (0.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 1016×305×314 vs W 40X211W 40X199 vs UB 1016×305×314W 40X199 vs HE 1000 BW 40X211 vs HE 1000 B
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…