CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 40X249 vs UB 1016×305×393

W 40X249 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; UB 1016×305×393 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). They are close to interchangeable in bending: 18353.5 cm³ against 18500 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.8%. W 40X249 is the lighter of the two at 370.6 kg/m against 392.7 kg/m, a saving of 5.6% on steel weight. Both are about 1008 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 40X249
W
UB 1016×305×393
UB
Difference
Mass370.6 kg/m392.7 kg/m-5.6%
Depth1000.8 mm1015.9 mm-1.5%
Width401.3 mm303 mm+32.4%
Web thickness19 mm24.4 mm-22.1%
Flange thickness36.1 mm43.9 mm-17.8%
Area474.2 cm²500 cm²-5.2%
Second moment, major (Iy)815,814 cm⁴808,000 cm⁴+1.0%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)18,353.5 cm³18,500 cm³-0.8%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)16,272.4 cm³15,900 cm³+2.3%
Second moment, minor (Iz)38,543 cm⁴20,500 cm⁴+88.0%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)2,982.4 cm³2,170 cm³+37.4%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)9.02 cm6.4 cm+40.9%
Torsion constant (It)1,586 cm⁴2,330 cm⁴-31.9%

W 40X249 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; UB 1016×305×393 to BS EN 10365:2017. Difference is expressed relative to UB 1016×305×393.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 40X249 has the larger second moment of area: 815,814 cm⁴ against 808,000 cm⁴, a difference of 1.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 40X249 is the more efficient section: 49.5 against 47.1 cm³ per kg/m, 5.1% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 40X249 has 2982.4 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 2170 cm³, 37.4% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and UB to BS EN 10365:2017; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 5.6% weight.

In short, UB 1016×305×393 is the stronger section and W 40X249 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 40X249 has a plastic modulus of 18353.5 cm³ and UB 1016×305×393 has 18500 cm³, a difference of only 0.8% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

W 40X249 at 370.6 kg/m, against 392.7 kg/m for the other - a saving of 5.6%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: UB 1016×305×393 gives 18500 cm³ of plastic modulus and 808,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 18353.5 cm³ and 815,814 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and BS EN 10365:2017), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 40X249, with a second moment of area of 815,814 cm⁴ against 808,000 cm⁴ (1.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 1016×305×393 vs HE 1000 x 393UB 1016×305×393 vs W 40X264W 40X249 vs HE 1000 x 393W 40X278 vs UB 1016×305×393
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…