CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 40X277 vs UB 1016×305×437

W 40X277 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; UB 1016×305×437 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). They are close to interchangeable in bending: 20483.8 cm³ against 20800 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.5%. W 40X277 is the lighter of the two at 412.2 kg/m against 437 kg/m, a saving of 5.7% on steel weight. Both are about 1017 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 40X277
W
UB 1016×305×437
UB
Difference
Mass412.2 kg/m437 kg/m-5.7%
Depth1008.4 mm1026.1 mm-1.7%
Width401.3 mm305.4 mm+31.4%
Web thickness21.1 mm26.9 mm-21.6%
Flange thickness40.1 mm49 mm-18.2%
Area525.8 cm²557 cm²-5.6%
Second moment, major (Iy)911,547 cm⁴910,000 cm⁴+0.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)20,483.8 cm³20,800 cm³-1.5%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)18,025.8 cm³17,700 cm³+1.8%
Second moment, minor (Iz)43,288 cm⁴23,400 cm⁴+85.0%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)3,343 cm³2,470 cm³+35.3%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)9.09 cm6.49 cm+40.1%
Torsion constant (It)2,144 cm⁴3,190 cm⁴-32.8%

W 40X277 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; UB 1016×305×437 to BS EN 10365:2017. Difference is expressed relative to UB 1016×305×437.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 40X277 has the larger second moment of area: 911,547 cm⁴ against 910,000 cm⁴, a difference of 0.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 40X277 is the more efficient section: 49.7 against 47.6 cm³ per kg/m, 4.4% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 40X277 has 3343 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 2470 cm³, 35.3% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and UB to BS EN 10365:2017; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 5.7% weight.

In short, UB 1016×305×437 is the stronger section and W 40X277 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 40X277 has a plastic modulus of 20483.8 cm³ and UB 1016×305×437 has 20800 cm³, a difference of only 1.5% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

W 40X277 at 412.2 kg/m, against 437 kg/m for the other - a saving of 5.7%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: UB 1016×305×437 gives 20800 cm³ of plastic modulus and 910,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 20483.8 cm³ and 911,547 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and BS EN 10365:2017), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 40X277, with a second moment of area of 911,547 cm⁴ against 910,000 cm⁴ (0.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 1016×305×437 vs HE 1000 x 438UB 1016×305×437 vs W 40X294W 44X262 vs UB 1016×305×437W 40X297 vs UB 1016×305×437W 40X277 vs HE 1000 x 438W 36X302 vs UB 1016×305×437W 36X318 vs UB 1016×305×437
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…