CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 1016×305×437 vs HE 1000 x 438

UB 1016×305×437 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); HE 1000 x 438 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 20800 cm³ against 20800 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.0%. They weigh essentially the same, 437 kg/m and 438 kg/m. Both are about 1026 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 1016×305×437
UB
HE 1000 x 438
HE
Difference
Mass437 kg/m438 kg/m-0.2%
Depth1026.1 mm1026 mmsame
Width305.4 mm305 mm+0.1%
Web thickness26.9 mm26.9 mmsame
Flange thickness49 mm49 mmsame
Area557 cm²556 cm²+0.2%
Second moment, major (Iy)910,000 cm⁴909,000 cm⁴+0.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)20,800 cm³20,800 cm³same
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)17,700 cm³17,700 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)23,400 cm⁴23,400 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)2,470 cm³2,460 cm³+0.4%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.49 cm6.48 cm+0.2%
Torsion constant (It)3,190 cm⁴3,180 cm⁴+0.3%

UB 1016×305×437 to BS EN 10365:2017; HE 1000 x 438 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 1000 x 438.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 1016×305×437 has the larger second moment of area: 910,000 cm⁴ against 909,000 cm⁴, a difference of 0.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (47.6 against 47.5 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 1016×305×437 has a plastic modulus of 20800 cm³ and HE 1000 x 438 has 20800 cm³, a difference of only 0.0% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 1016×305×437 is 437 kg/m and HE 1000 x 438 is 438 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 1000 x 438 gives 20800 cm³ of plastic modulus and 909,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 20800 cm³ and 910,000 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 1016×305×437, with a second moment of area of 910,000 cm⁴ against 909,000 cm⁴ (0.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 1016×305×437 vs W 40X294W 44X262 vs UB 1016×305×437W 44X262 vs HE 1000 x 438W 40X297 vs UB 1016×305×437W 40X297 vs HE 1000 x 438W 40X277 vs UB 1016×305×437W 40X277 vs HE 1000 x 438W 40X294 vs HE 1000 x 438
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…