CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 44X262 vs HE 1000 x 438

W 44X262 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HE 1000 x 438 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 20811.6 cm³ against 20800 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.1%. W 44X262 is the lighter of the two at 389.9 kg/m against 438 kg/m, a saving of 11.0% on steel weight. W 44X262 is deeper, 1099.8 mm against 1026 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 44X262
W
HE 1000 x 438
HE
Difference
Mass389.9 kg/m438 kg/m-11.0%
Depth1099.8 mm1026 mm+7.2%
Width401.3 mm305 mm+31.6%
Web thickness19.9 mm26.9 mm-26.0%
Flange thickness36.1 mm49 mm-26.3%
Area498.1 cm²556 cm²-10.4%
Second moment, major (Iy)1,003,118 cm⁴909,000 cm⁴+10.4%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)20,811.6 cm³20,800 cm³+0.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)18,189.6 cm³17,700 cm³+2.8%
Second moment, minor (Iz)38,418 cm⁴23,400 cm⁴+64.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)2,982.4 cm³2,460 cm³+21.2%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)8.81 cm6.48 cm+36.0%
Torsion constant (It)1,553 cm⁴3,180 cm⁴-51.2%

W 44X262 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HE 1000 x 438 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 1000 x 438.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 44X262 has the larger second moment of area: 1,003,118 cm⁴ against 909,000 cm⁴, a difference of 10.4%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 44X262 is the more efficient section: 53.4 against 47.5 cm³ per kg/m, 12.4% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 44X262 has 2982.4 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 2460 cm³, 21.2% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 11.0% weight.

In short, W 44X262 is the stronger section and W 44X262 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 44X262 has a plastic modulus of 20811.6 cm³ and HE 1000 x 438 has 20800 cm³, a difference of only 0.1% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

W 44X262 at 389.9 kg/m, against 438 kg/m for the other - a saving of 11.0%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 1000 x 438 gives 20800 cm³ of plastic modulus and 909,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 20811.6 cm³ and 1,003,118 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 44X262, with a second moment of area of 1,003,118 cm⁴ against 909,000 cm⁴ (10.4% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 1016×305×437 vs HE 1000 x 438W 44X262 vs UB 1016×305×437W 40X297 vs HE 1000 x 438W 40X277 vs HE 1000 x 438W 40X294 vs HE 1000 x 438W 36X318 vs HE 1000 x 438
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…