CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 40X294 vs HE 1000 x 438

W 40X294 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HE 1000 x 438 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 20811.6 cm³ against 20800 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.1%. They weigh essentially the same, 437.5 kg/m and 438 kg/m. Both are about 1026 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 40X294
W
HE 1000 x 438
HE
Difference
Mass437.5 kg/m438 kg/m-0.1%
Depth1026.2 mm1026 mmsame
Width304.8 mm305 mm-0.1%
Web thickness26.9 mm26.9 mmsame
Flange thickness49 mm49 mmsame
Area556.1 cm²556 cm²same
Second moment, major (Iy)911,547 cm⁴909,000 cm⁴+0.3%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)20,811.6 cm³20,800 cm³+0.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)17,698 cm³17,700 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)23,392 cm⁴23,400 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)2,458.1 cm³2,460 cm³-0.1%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.48 cm6.48 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)3,188 cm⁴3,180 cm⁴+0.3%

W 40X294 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HE 1000 x 438 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 1000 x 438.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 40X294 has the larger second moment of area: 911,547 cm⁴ against 909,000 cm⁴, a difference of 0.3%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (47.6 against 47.5 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 40X294 has a plastic modulus of 20811.6 cm³ and HE 1000 x 438 has 20800 cm³, a difference of only 0.1% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: W 40X294 is 437.5 kg/m and HE 1000 x 438 is 438 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 1000 x 438 gives 20800 cm³ of plastic modulus and 909,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 20811.6 cm³ and 911,547 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 40X294, with a second moment of area of 911,547 cm⁴ against 909,000 cm⁴ (0.3% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 1016×305×437 vs HE 1000 x 438UB 1016×305×437 vs W 40X294W 44X262 vs HE 1000 x 438W 40X297 vs HE 1000 x 438W 40X277 vs HE 1000 x 438W 36X318 vs HE 1000 x 438
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…