CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 40X372 vs HE 1000 x 584

W 40X372 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HE 1000 x 584 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 27530.3 cm³ against 28000 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.7%. W 40X372 is the lighter of the two at 553.6 kg/m against 584 kg/m, a saving of 5.2% on steel weight. HE 1000 x 584 is deeper, 1056 mm against 1031.2 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 40X372
W
HE 1000 x 584
HE
Difference
Mass553.6 kg/m584 kg/m-5.2%
Depth1031.2 mm1056 mm-2.3%
Width408.9 mm314 mm+30.2%
Web thickness29.5 mm36 mm-18.1%
Flange thickness52.1 mm64 mm-18.6%
Area709.7 cm²744 cm²-4.6%
Second moment, major (Iy)1,232,045 cm⁴1,246,000 cm⁴-1.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)27,530.3 cm³28,000 cm³-1.7%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)23,925.1 cm³23,600 cm³+1.4%
Second moment, minor (Iz)59,105 cm⁴33,400 cm⁴+77.0%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)4,539.2 cm³3,480 cm³+30.4%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)9.14 cm6.7 cm+36.4%
Torsion constant (It)4,828 cm⁴7,150 cm⁴-32.5%

W 40X372 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HE 1000 x 584 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 1000 x 584.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, HE 1000 x 584 has the larger second moment of area: 1,246,000 cm⁴ against 1,232,045 cm⁴, a difference of 1.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 40X372 is the more efficient section: 49.7 against 47.9 cm³ per kg/m, 3.7% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 40X372 has 4539.2 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 3480 cm³, 30.4% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 5.2% weight.

In short, HE 1000 x 584 is the stronger section and W 40X372 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 40X372 has a plastic modulus of 27530.3 cm³ and HE 1000 x 584 has 28000 cm³, a difference of only 1.7% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

W 40X372 at 553.6 kg/m, against 584 kg/m for the other - a saving of 5.2%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 1000 x 584 gives 28000 cm³ of plastic modulus and 1,246,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 27530.3 cm³ and 1,232,045 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

HE 1000 x 584, with a second moment of area of 1,246,000 cm⁴ against 1,232,045 cm⁴ (1.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

W 40X362 vs HE 1000 x 584W 40X392 vs HE 1000 x 584W 36X395 vs HE 1000 x 584
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…