CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 40X392 vs HE 1000 x 584

W 40X392 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HE 1000 x 584 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 28021.9 cm³ against 28000 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.1%. They weigh essentially the same, 583.4 kg/m and 584 kg/m. Both are about 1056 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 40X392
W
HE 1000 x 584
HE
Difference
Mass583.4 kg/m584 kg/m-0.1%
Depth1056.6 mm1056 mm+0.1%
Width315 mm314 mm+0.3%
Web thickness36.1 mm36 mm+0.3%
Flange thickness64 mm64 mmsame
Area748.4 cm²744 cm²+0.6%
Second moment, major (Iy)1,244,532 cm⁴1,246,000 cm⁴-0.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)28,021.9 cm³28,000 cm³+0.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)23,597.4 cm³23,600 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)33,423 cm⁴33,400 cm⁴+0.1%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)3,474.1 cm³3,480 cm³-0.2%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.71 cm6.7 cm+0.1%
Torsion constant (It)7,159 cm⁴7,150 cm⁴+0.1%

W 40X392 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HE 1000 x 584 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 1000 x 584.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, HE 1000 x 584 has the larger second moment of area: 1,246,000 cm⁴ against 1,244,532 cm⁴, a difference of 0.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (48.0 against 47.9 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 40X392 has a plastic modulus of 28021.9 cm³ and HE 1000 x 584 has 28000 cm³, a difference of only 0.1% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: W 40X392 is 583.4 kg/m and HE 1000 x 584 is 584 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 1000 x 584 gives 28000 cm³ of plastic modulus and 1,246,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 28021.9 cm³ and 1,244,532 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

HE 1000 x 584, with a second moment of area of 1,246,000 cm⁴ against 1,244,532 cm⁴ (0.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

W 40X372 vs HE 1000 x 584W 40X362 vs HE 1000 x 584W 36X395 vs HE 1000 x 584
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…