CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 6X20 vs H-150x150x7x10-31.1

W 6X20 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-150x150x7x10-31.1 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 244.17 cm³ against 243 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.5%. W 6X20 is the lighter of the two at 29.8 kg/m against 31.1 kg/m, a saving of 4.2% on steel weight. W 6X20 is deeper, 157.5 mm against 150 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 6X20
W
H-150x150x7x10-31.1
MB & MC
Difference
Mass29.8 kg/m31.1 kg/m-4.2%
Depth157.5 mm150 mm+5.0%
Width152.9 mm150 mm+1.9%
Web thickness6.6 mm7 mm-5.7%
Flange thickness9.3 mm10 mm-7.0%
Area37.9 cm²39.6 cm²-4.3%
Second moment, major (Iy)1,723 cm⁴1,623 cm⁴+6.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)244.17 cm³243 cm³+0.5%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)219.59 cm³216 cm³+1.7%
Second moment, minor (Iz)553.6 cm⁴563 cm⁴-1.7%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)110.12 cm³114 cm³-3.4%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.81 cm3.77 cm+1.1%
Torsion constant (It)9.99 cm⁴12.5 cm⁴-20.1%

W 6X20 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-150x150x7x10-31.1 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-150x150x7x10-31.1.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 6X20 has the larger second moment of area: 1,723 cm⁴ against 1,623 cm⁴, a difference of 6.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 6X20 is the more efficient section: 8.2 against 7.8 cm³ per kg/m, 4.9% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 4.2% weight.

In short, W 6X20 is the stronger section and W 6X20 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 6X20 has a plastic modulus of 244.17 cm³ and H-150x150x7x10-31.1 has 243 cm³, a difference of only 0.5% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

W 6X20 at 29.8 kg/m, against 31.1 kg/m for the other - a saving of 4.2%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-150x150x7x10-31.1 gives 243 cm³ of plastic modulus and 1,623 cm⁴ of inertia against 244.17 cm³ and 1,723 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 6X20, with a second moment of area of 1,723 cm⁴ against 1,623 cm⁴ (6.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 152×152×30 vs W 6X20W 6X20 vs HE 160 A
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…