CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 6X20 vs HE 160 A

W 6X20 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HE 160 A is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 244.17 cm³ against 245 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.3%. They weigh essentially the same, 29.8 kg/m and 30.4 kg/m. W 6X20 is deeper, 157.5 mm against 152 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 6X20
W
HE 160 A
HE
Difference
Mass29.8 kg/m30.4 kg/m-2.0%
Depth157.5 mm152 mm+3.6%
Width152.9 mm160 mm-4.4%
Web thickness6.6 mm6 mm+10.0%
Flange thickness9.3 mm9 mm+3.3%
Area37.9 cm²38.8 cm²-2.3%
Second moment, major (Iy)1,723 cm⁴1,670 cm⁴+3.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)244.17 cm³245 cm³-0.3%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)219.59 cm³220 cm³-0.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)553.6 cm⁴616 cm⁴-10.1%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)110.12 cm³118 cm³-6.7%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.81 cm3.98 cm-4.3%
Torsion constant (It)9.99 cm⁴12.1 cm⁴-17.4%

W 6X20 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HE 160 A to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 160 A.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 6X20 has the larger second moment of area: 1,723 cm⁴ against 1,670 cm⁴, a difference of 3.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (8.2 against 8.1 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 6X20 has a plastic modulus of 244.17 cm³ and HE 160 A has 245 cm³, a difference of only 0.3% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: W 6X20 is 29.8 kg/m and HE 160 A is 30.4 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 160 A gives 245 cm³ of plastic modulus and 1,670 cm⁴ of inertia against 244.17 cm³ and 1,723 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 6X20, with a second moment of area of 1,723 cm⁴ against 1,670 cm⁴ (3.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 152×152×30 vs HE 160 AUC 152×152×30 vs W 6X20W 6X20 vs H-150x150x7x10-31.1HE 160 A vs H-150x150x7x10-31.5
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…