CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

HE 160 A vs H-150x150x7x10-31.5

HE 160 A is an HE section from the European (Continental) range; H-150x150x7x10-31.5 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 245 cm³ against 246 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.4%. HE 160 A is the lighter of the two at 30.4 kg/m against 31.5 kg/m, a saving of 3.5% on steel weight. Both are about 151 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyHE 160 A
HE
H-150x150x7x10-31.5
MB & MC
Difference
Mass30.4 kg/m31.5 kg/m-3.5%
Depth152 mm150 mm+1.3%
Width160 mm150 mm+6.7%
Web thickness6 mm7 mm-14.3%
Flange thickness9 mm10 mm-10.0%
Area38.8 cm²40.1 cm²-3.2%
Second moment, major (Iy)1,670 cm⁴1,641 cm⁴+1.8%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)245 cm³246 cm³-0.4%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)220 cm³219 cm³+0.5%
Second moment, minor (Iz)616 cm⁴563 cm⁴+9.4%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)118 cm³115 cm³+2.6%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.98 cm3.75 cm+6.1%
Torsion constant (It)12.1 cm⁴13.5 cm⁴-10.4%

HE 160 A to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; H-150x150x7x10-31.5 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-150x150x7x10-31.5.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, HE 160 A has the larger second moment of area: 1,670 cm⁴ against 1,641 cm⁴, a difference of 1.8%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, HE 160 A is the more efficient section: 8.1 against 7.8 cm³ per kg/m, 3.2% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

In short, H-150x150x7x10-31.5 is the stronger section and HE 160 A is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. HE 160 A has a plastic modulus of 245 cm³ and H-150x150x7x10-31.5 has 246 cm³, a difference of only 0.4% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

HE 160 A at 30.4 kg/m, against 31.5 kg/m for the other - a saving of 3.5%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-150x150x7x10-31.5 gives 246 cm³ of plastic modulus and 1,641 cm⁴ of inertia against 245 cm³ and 1,670 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

HE 160 A, with a second moment of area of 1,670 cm⁴ against 1,641 cm⁴ (1.8% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 152×152×30 vs HE 160 AUC 152×152×30 vs H-150x150x7x10-31.5W 6X20 vs HE 160 A
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…