CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 8X18 vs S 8X18.4

W 8X18 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; S 8X18.4 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. W 8X18 carries more bending: 278.58 cm³ of plastic modulus against 270.39 cm³, 3.0% more. W 8X18 is the lighter of the two at 26.8 kg/m against 27.4 kg/m, a saving of 2.2% on steel weight. Both are about 205 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 8X18
W
S 8X18.4
S
Difference
Mass26.8 kg/m27.4 kg/m-2.2%
Depth206.8 mm203.2 mm+1.8%
Width133.4 mm101.6 mm+31.3%
Web thickness5.8 mm6.9 mm-15.9%
Flange thickness8.4 mm10.8 mm-22.2%
Area33.9 cm²34.8 cm²-2.6%
Second moment, major (Iy)2,576 cm⁴2,393 cm⁴+7.6%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)278.58 cm³270.39 cm³+3.0%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)249.08 cm³235.97 cm³+5.6%
Second moment, minor (Iz)331.7 cm⁴153.6 cm⁴+116.0%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)76.364 cm³52.111 cm³+46.5%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.12 cm2.1 cm+48.6%
Torsion constant (It)7.16 cm⁴13.94 cm⁴-48.6%

W 8X18 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; S 8X18.4 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to S 8X18.4.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 8X18 has the larger second moment of area: 2,576 cm⁴ against 2,393 cm⁴, a difference of 7.6%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 8X18 is the more efficient section: 10.4 against 9.9 cm³ per kg/m, 5.3% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 8X18 has 76.364 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 52.111 cm³, 46.5% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

In short, W 8X18 is the stronger section and W 8X18 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

W 8X18 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 278.58 cm³ against 270.39 cm³ - 3.0% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

W 8X18 at 26.8 kg/m, against 27.4 kg/m for the other - a saving of 2.2%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: S 8X18.4 gives 270.39 cm³ of plastic modulus and 2,393 cm⁴ of inertia against 278.58 cm³ and 2,576 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

W 8X18, with a second moment of area of 2,576 cm⁴ against 2,393 cm⁴ (7.6% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

IPE 220 vs W 8X18UB 203×133×25 vs S 8X18.4
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…