CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

IPE 220 vs W 8X18

IPE 220 is an IPE section from the European (Continental) range; W 8X18 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. IPE 220 carries more bending: 285 cm³ of plastic modulus against 278.58 cm³, 2.3% more. IPE 220 is the lighter of the two at 26.2 kg/m against 26.8 kg/m, a saving of 2.2% on steel weight. IPE 220 is deeper, 220 mm against 206.8 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyIPE 220
IPE
W 8X18
W
Difference
Mass26.2 kg/m26.8 kg/m-2.2%
Depth220 mm206.8 mm+6.4%
Width110 mm133.4 mm-17.5%
Web thickness5.9 mm5.8 mm+1.7%
Flange thickness9.2 mm8.4 mm+9.5%
Area33.4 cm²33.9 cm²-1.5%
Second moment, major (Iy)2,770 cm⁴2,576 cm⁴+7.5%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)285 cm³278.58 cm³+2.3%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)252 cm³249.08 cm³+1.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)205 cm⁴331.7 cm⁴-38.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)58.1 cm³76.364 cm³-23.9%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)2.48 cm3.12 cm-20.5%
Torsion constant (It)9.03 cm⁴7.16 cm⁴+26.1%

IPE 220 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; W 8X18 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 8X18.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, IPE 220 has the larger second moment of area: 2,770 cm⁴ against 2,576 cm⁴, a difference of 7.5%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, IPE 220 is the more efficient section: 10.9 against 10.4 cm³ per kg/m, 4.6% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: W 8X18 has 76.364 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 58.1 cm³, 23.9% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. IPE sections are specified to EN 10365 · Continental Steel and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 2.2% weight.

In short, IPE 220 is the stronger section and IPE 220 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

IPE 220 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 285 cm³ against 278.58 cm³ - 2.3% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

IPE 220 at 26.2 kg/m, against 26.8 kg/m for the other - a saving of 2.2%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 8X18 gives 278.58 cm³ of plastic modulus and 2,576 cm⁴ of inertia against 285 cm³ and 2,770 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (EN 10365 · Continental Steel and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

IPE 220, with a second moment of area of 2,770 cm⁴ against 2,576 cm⁴ (7.5% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

W 8X18 vs S 8X18.4
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…