CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 8X28 vs H-200x200x6.5x10

W 8X28 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; H-200x200x6.5x10 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. W 8X28 carries more bending: 445.73 cm³ of plastic modulus against 433 cm³, 2.9% more. They weigh essentially the same, 41.7 kg/m and 41.4 kg/m. W 8X28 is deeper, 204.7 mm against 196 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 8X28
W
H-200x200x6.5x10
MB & MC
Difference
Mass41.7 kg/m41.4 kg/m+0.7%
Depth204.7 mm196 mm+4.4%
Width166.1 mm199 mm-16.5%
Web thickness7.2 mm6.5 mm+10.8%
Flange thickness11.8 mm10 mm+18.0%
Area53.2 cm²52.7 cm²+0.9%
Second moment, major (Iy)4,079 cm⁴3,846 cm⁴+6.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)445.73 cm³433 cm³+2.9%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)398.21 cm³392 cm³+1.6%
Second moment, minor (Iz)903.2 cm⁴1,315 cm⁴-31.3%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)165.51 cm³201 cm³-17.7%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.11 cm5 cm-17.8%
Torsion constant (It)22.35 cm⁴17.6 cm⁴+27.0%

W 8X28 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; H-200x200x6.5x10 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-200x200x6.5x10.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 8X28 has the larger second moment of area: 4,079 cm⁴ against 3,846 cm⁴, a difference of 6.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 8X28 is the more efficient section: 10.7 against 10.5 cm³ per kg/m, 2.2% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: H-200x200x6.5x10 has 201 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 165.51 cm³, 17.7% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, W 8X28 is the stronger section and H-200x200x6.5x10 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

W 8X28 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 445.73 cm³ against 433 cm³ - 2.9% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: W 8X28 is 41.7 kg/m and H-200x200x6.5x10 is 41.4 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-200x200x6.5x10 gives 433 cm³ of plastic modulus and 3,846 cm⁴ of inertia against 445.73 cm³ and 4,079 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 8X28, with a second moment of area of 4,079 cm⁴ against 3,846 cm⁴ (6.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

W 8X28 vs HE 220 AAHE 200 A vs H-200x200x6.5x10
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…