CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

W 8X40 vs HE 200 B

W 8X40 is an W section from the American AISC Shapes Database; HE 200 B is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 652.21 cm³ against 642 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.6%. W 8X40 is the lighter of the two at 59.5 kg/m against 61.3 kg/m, a saving of 2.9% on steel weight. W 8X40 is deeper, 209.6 mm against 200 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyW 8X40
W
HE 200 B
HE
Difference
Mass59.5 kg/m61.3 kg/m-2.9%
Depth209.6 mm200 mm+4.8%
Width205 mm200 mm+2.5%
Web thickness9.1 mm9 mm+1.1%
Flange thickness14.2 mm15 mm-5.3%
Area75.5 cm²78.1 cm²-3.3%
Second moment, major (Iy)6,077 cm⁴5,700 cm⁴+6.6%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)652.21 cm³642 cm³+1.6%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)581.74 cm³570 cm³+2.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)2,044 cm⁴2,000 cm⁴+2.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)303.16 cm³306 cm³-0.9%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)5.18 cm5.07 cm+2.2%
Torsion constant (It)46.62 cm⁴59.7 cm⁴-21.9%

W 8X40 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; HE 200 B to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 200 B.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 8X40 has the larger second moment of area: 6,077 cm⁴ against 5,700 cm⁴, a difference of 6.6%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 8X40 is the more efficient section: 11.0 against 10.5 cm³ per kg/m, 4.7% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. W sections are specified to AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 2.9% weight.

In short, W 8X40 is the stronger section and W 8X40 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. W 8X40 has a plastic modulus of 652.21 cm³ and HE 200 B has 642 cm³, a difference of only 1.6% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

W 8X40 at 59.5 kg/m, against 61.3 kg/m for the other - a saving of 2.9%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 200 B gives 642 cm³ of plastic modulus and 5,700 cm⁴ of inertia against 652.21 cm³ and 6,077 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (AISC Shapes Database v16.0 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 8X40, with a second moment of area of 6,077 cm⁴ against 5,700 cm⁴ (6.6% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 203×203×60 vs HE 200 BUC 203×203×60 vs W 8X40HE 200 B vs H-200x200x9x14
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…