CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UC 203×203×60 vs HE 200 B

UC 203×203×60 is an UC section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); HE 200 B is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. UC 203×203×60 carries more bending: 656 cm³ of plastic modulus against 642 cm³, 2.2% more. UC 203×203×60 is the lighter of the two at 60 kg/m against 61.3 kg/m, a saving of 2.1% on steel weight. UC 203×203×60 is deeper, 209.6 mm against 200 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUC 203×203×60
UC
HE 200 B
HE
Difference
Mass60 kg/m61.3 kg/m-2.1%
Depth209.6 mm200 mm+4.8%
Width205.8 mm200 mm+2.9%
Web thickness9.4 mm9 mm+4.4%
Flange thickness14.2 mm15 mm-5.3%
Area76.4 cm²78.1 cm²-2.2%
Second moment, major (Iy)6,120 cm⁴5,700 cm⁴+7.4%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)656 cm³642 cm³+2.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)584 cm³570 cm³+2.5%
Second moment, minor (Iz)2,060 cm⁴2,000 cm⁴+3.0%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)305 cm³306 cm³-0.3%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)5.2 cm5.07 cm+2.6%
Torsion constant (It)47.2 cm⁴59.7 cm⁴-20.9%

UC 203×203×60 to BS EN 10365:2017; HE 200 B to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 200 B.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UC 203×203×60 has the larger second moment of area: 6,120 cm⁴ against 5,700 cm⁴, a difference of 7.4%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, UC 203×203×60 is the more efficient section: 10.9 against 10.5 cm³ per kg/m, 4.4% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UC sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 2.1% weight.

In short, UC 203×203×60 is the stronger section and UC 203×203×60 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

UC 203×203×60 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 656 cm³ against 642 cm³ - 2.2% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

UC 203×203×60 at 60 kg/m, against 61.3 kg/m for the other - a saving of 2.1%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 200 B gives 642 cm³ of plastic modulus and 5,700 cm⁴ of inertia against 656 cm³ and 6,120 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UC 203×203×60, with a second moment of area of 6,120 cm⁴ against 5,700 cm⁴ (7.4% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 203×203×60 vs W 8X40W 8X40 vs HE 200 BHE 200 B vs H-200x200x9x14
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…