CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

CHS 508×16 vs CF CHS 508×16

CHS 508×16 is an CHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF CHS 508×16 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). They are close to interchangeable in bending: 3870 cm³ against 3870 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.0%. They weigh essentially the same, 194 kg/m and 194 kg/m. Both are about 508 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyCHS 508×16
CHS Hot-finished
CF CHS 508×16
CHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass194 kg/m194 kg/msame
Depth508 mm508 mmsame
Width508 mm508 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area247 cm²247 cm²same
Second moment, major (Iy)74,900 cm⁴74,900 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)3,870 cm³3,870 cm³same
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,950 cm³2,950 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)74,900 cm⁴74,900 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)3,870 cm³3,870 cm³same
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)17.4 cm17.4 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)150,000 cm⁴150,000 cm⁴same

CHS 508×16 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF CHS 508×16 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF CHS 508×16.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, CF CHS 508×16 has the larger second moment of area: 74,900 cm⁴ against 74,900 cm⁴, a difference of 0.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (19.9 against 19.9 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. CHS 508×16 has a plastic modulus of 3870 cm³ and CF CHS 508×16 has 3870 cm³, a difference of only 0.0% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: CHS 508×16 is 194 kg/m and CF CHS 508×16 is 194 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: CF CHS 508×16 gives 3870 cm³ of plastic modulus and 74,900 cm⁴ of inertia against 3870 cm³ and 74,900 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

CF CHS 508×16, with a second moment of area of 74,900 cm⁴ against 74,900 cm⁴ (0.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…