CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

HE 320 A vs HP 12X74

HE 320 A is an HE section from the European (Continental) range; HP 12X74 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. HP 12X74 carries more bending: 1720.6 cm³ of plastic modulus against 1630 cm³, 5.3% more. HE 320 A is the lighter of the two at 97.6 kg/m against 110.1 kg/m, a saving of 11.4% on steel weight. Both are about 309 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyHE 320 A
HE
HP 12X74
HP
Difference
Mass97.6 kg/m110.1 kg/m-11.4%
Depth310 mm307.3 mm+0.9%
Width300 mm309.9 mm-3.2%
Web thickness9 mm15.4 mm-41.6%
Flange thickness15.5 mm15.5 mmsame
Area124 cm²140.6 cm²-11.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)22,900 cm⁴23,684 cm⁴-3.3%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,630 cm³1,720.6 cm³-5.3%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,480 cm³1,537.1 cm³-3.7%
Second moment, minor (Iz)6,980 cm⁴7,742 cm⁴-9.8%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)710 cm³763.64 cm³-7.0%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7.49 cm7.42 cm+0.9%
Torsion constant (It)112 cm⁴124 cm⁴-9.7%

HE 320 A to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; HP 12X74 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to HP 12X74.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, HP 12X74 has the larger second moment of area: 23,684 cm⁴ against 22,900 cm⁴, a difference of 3.3%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, HE 320 A is the more efficient section: 16.7 against 15.6 cm³ per kg/m, 6.9% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. HE sections are specified to EN 10365 · Continental Steel and HP to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 11.4% weight.

In short, HP 12X74 is the stronger section and HE 320 A is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

HP 12X74 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 1720.6 cm³ against 1630 cm³ - 5.3% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

HE 320 A at 97.6 kg/m, against 110.1 kg/m for the other - a saving of 11.4%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HP 12X74 gives 1720.6 cm³ of plastic modulus and 23,684 cm⁴ of inertia against 1630 cm³ and 22,900 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (EN 10365 · Continental Steel and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

HP 12X74, with a second moment of area of 23,684 cm⁴ against 22,900 cm⁴ (3.3% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 305×305×97 vs HE 320 AW 12X72 vs HP 12X74W 12X65 vs HE 320 AHE 320 A vs H-300x300x15x15
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…