CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UC 305×305×97 vs HE 320 A

UC 305×305×97 is an UC section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); HE 320 A is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. HE 320 A carries more bending: 1630 cm³ of plastic modulus against 1590 cm³, 2.5% more. They weigh essentially the same, 96.9 kg/m and 97.6 kg/m. Both are about 309 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUC 305×305×97
UC
HE 320 A
HE
Difference
Mass96.9 kg/m97.6 kg/m-0.7%
Depth307.9 mm310 mm-0.7%
Width305.3 mm300 mm+1.8%
Web thickness9.9 mm9 mm+10.0%
Flange thickness15.4 mm15.5 mm-0.6%
Area123 cm²124 cm²-0.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)22,200 cm⁴22,900 cm⁴-3.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,590 cm³1,630 cm³-2.5%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,450 cm³1,480 cm³-2.0%
Second moment, minor (Iz)7,310 cm⁴6,980 cm⁴+4.7%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)726 cm³710 cm³+2.3%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7.69 cm7.49 cm+2.7%
Torsion constant (It)91.2 cm⁴112 cm⁴-18.6%

UC 305×305×97 to BS EN 10365:2017; HE 320 A to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 320 A.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, HE 320 A has the larger second moment of area: 22,900 cm⁴ against 22,200 cm⁴, a difference of 3.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (16.4 against 16.7 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UC sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, HE 320 A is the stronger section and UC 305×305×97 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

HE 320 A is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 1630 cm³ against 1590 cm³ - 2.5% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: UC 305×305×97 is 96.9 kg/m and HE 320 A is 97.6 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 320 A gives 1630 cm³ of plastic modulus and 22,900 cm⁴ of inertia against 1590 cm³ and 22,200 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

HE 320 A, with a second moment of area of 22,900 cm⁴ against 22,200 cm⁴ (3.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 305×305×97 vs W 12X65UC 305×305×97 vs H-300x300x15x15W 12X65 vs HE 320 AHE 320 A vs HP 12X74HE 320 A vs H-300x300x15x15
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…