CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

HE 320 B vs HP 12X89

HE 320 B is an HE section from the European (Continental) range; HP 12X89 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. HE 320 B carries more bending: 2150 cm³ of plastic modulus against 2081.2 cm³, 3.3% more. HE 320 B is the lighter of the two at 127 kg/m against 132.4 kg/m, a saving of 4.1% on steel weight. Both are about 318 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyHE 320 B
HE
HP 12X89
HP
Difference
Mass127 kg/m132.4 kg/m-4.1%
Depth320 mm315 mm+1.6%
Width300 mm312.4 mm-4.0%
Web thickness11.5 mm18.3 mm-37.2%
Flange thickness20.5 mm18.3 mm+12.0%
Area161 cm²167.1 cm²-3.7%
Second moment, major (Iy)30,800 cm⁴28,845 cm⁴+6.8%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,150 cm³2,081.2 cm³+3.3%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,930 cm³1,835.4 cm³+5.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)9,240 cm⁴9,324 cm⁴-0.9%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)939 cm³917.68 cm³+2.3%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7.57 cm7.47 cm+1.3%
Torsion constant (It)230 cm⁴204.8 cm⁴+12.3%

HE 320 B to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; HP 12X89 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to HP 12X89.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, HE 320 B has the larger second moment of area: 30,800 cm⁴ against 28,845 cm⁴, a difference of 6.8%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, HE 320 B is the more efficient section: 16.9 against 15.7 cm³ per kg/m, 7.7% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. HE sections are specified to EN 10365 · Continental Steel and HP to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 4.1% weight.

In short, HE 320 B is the stronger section and HE 320 B is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

HE 320 B is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 2150 cm³ against 2081.2 cm³ - 3.3% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

HE 320 B at 127 kg/m, against 132.4 kg/m for the other - a saving of 4.1%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HP 12X89 gives 2081.2 cm³ of plastic modulus and 28,845 cm⁴ of inertia against 2150 cm³ and 30,800 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (EN 10365 · Continental Steel and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

HE 320 B, with a second moment of area of 30,800 cm⁴ against 28,845 cm⁴ (6.8% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

W 12X87 vs HE 320 BW 12X87 vs HP 12X89HE 320 B vs H-350x350x10x16-115
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…