CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

HE 400 B vs W 16X100

HE 400 B is an HE section from the European (Continental) range; W 16X100 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 3230 cm³ against 3244.6 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.4%. W 16X100 is the lighter of the two at 148.8 kg/m against 155 kg/m, a saving of 4.2% on steel weight. W 16X100 is deeper, 431.8 mm against 400 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyHE 400 B
HE
W 16X100
W
Difference
Mass155 kg/m148.8 kg/m+4.2%
Depth400 mm431.8 mm-7.4%
Width300 mm264.2 mm+13.6%
Web thickness13.5 mm14.9 mm-9.4%
Flange thickness24 mm25 mm-4.0%
Area198 cm²189.7 cm²+4.4%
Second moment, major (Iy)57,700 cm⁴62,018 cm⁴-7.0%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)3,230 cm³3,244.6 cm³-0.4%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,880 cm³2,867.7 cm³+0.4%
Second moment, minor (Iz)10,800 cm⁴7,742 cm⁴+39.5%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,100 cm³899.65 cm³+22.3%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7.4 cm6.38 cm+16.0%
Torsion constant (It)361 cm⁴321.7 cm⁴+12.2%

HE 400 B to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; W 16X100 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 16X100.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 16X100 has the larger second moment of area: 62,018 cm⁴ against 57,700 cm⁴, a difference of 7.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, W 16X100 is the more efficient section: 21.8 against 20.8 cm³ per kg/m, 4.4% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: HE 400 B has 1100 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 899.65 cm³, 22.3% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. HE sections are specified to EN 10365 · Continental Steel and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 4.2% weight.

In short, W 16X100 is the stronger section and W 16X100 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. HE 400 B has a plastic modulus of 3230 cm³ and W 16X100 has 3244.6 cm³, a difference of only 0.4% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

W 16X100 at 148.8 kg/m, against 155 kg/m for the other - a saving of 4.2%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 16X100 gives 3244.6 cm³ of plastic modulus and 62,018 cm⁴ of inertia against 3230 cm³ and 57,700 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (EN 10365 · Continental Steel and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 16X100, with a second moment of area of 62,018 cm⁴ against 57,700 cm⁴ (7.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

W 16X100 vs HE 450 AW 16X100 vs H-450x300x13x21HE 400 B vs H-400x400x11x18
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…