CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

HE 400 B vs H-400x400x11x18

HE 400 B is an HE section from the European (Continental) range; H-400x400x11x18 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. HE 400 B carries more bending: 3230 cm³ of plastic modulus against 3118 cm³, 3.6% more. H-400x400x11x18 is the lighter of the two at 147 kg/m against 155 kg/m, a saving of 5.4% on steel weight. Both are about 397 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyHE 400 B
HE
H-400x400x11x18
MB & MC
Difference
Mass155 kg/m147 kg/m+5.4%
Depth400 mm394 mm+1.5%
Width300 mm398 mm-24.6%
Web thickness13.5 mm11 mm+22.7%
Flange thickness24 mm18 mm+33.3%
Area198 cm²187 cm²+5.9%
Second moment, major (Iy)57,700 cm⁴56,150 cm⁴+2.8%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)3,230 cm³3,118 cm³+3.6%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,880 cm³2,850 cm³+1.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)10,800 cm⁴18,930 cm⁴-42.9%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,100 cm³1,441 cm³-23.7%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7.4 cm10.1 cm-26.7%
Torsion constant (It)361 cm⁴194 cm⁴+86.1%

HE 400 B to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; H-400x400x11x18 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-400x400x11x18.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, HE 400 B has the larger second moment of area: 57,700 cm⁴ against 56,150 cm⁴, a difference of 2.8%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (20.8 against 21.2 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: H-400x400x11x18 has 1441 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 1100 cm³, 23.7% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

In short, HE 400 B is the stronger section and H-400x400x11x18 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

HE 400 B is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 3230 cm³ against 3118 cm³ - 3.6% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

H-400x400x11x18 at 147 kg/m, against 155 kg/m for the other - a saving of 5.4%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-400x400x11x18 gives 3118 cm³ of plastic modulus and 56,150 cm⁴ of inertia against 3230 cm³ and 57,700 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

HE 400 B, with a second moment of area of 57,700 cm⁴ against 56,150 cm⁴ (2.8% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

W 14X109 vs H-400x400x11x18HE 400 B vs W 16X100
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…