CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

IPE 240 vs H-250x125x6x9-29.6

IPE 240 is an IPE section from the European (Continental) range; H-250x125x6x9-29.6 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 367 cm³ against 366 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.3%. H-250x125x6x9-29.6 is the lighter of the two at 29.6 kg/m against 30.7 kg/m, a saving of 3.7% on steel weight. H-250x125x6x9-29.6 is deeper, 250 mm against 240 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyIPE 240
IPE
H-250x125x6x9-29.6
MB & MC
Difference
Mass30.7 kg/m29.6 kg/m+3.7%
Depth240 mm250 mm-4.0%
Width120 mm125 mm-4.0%
Web thickness6.2 mm6 mm+3.3%
Flange thickness9.8 mm9 mm+8.9%
Area39.1 cm²37.7 cm²+3.7%
Second moment, major (Iy)3,890 cm⁴4,052 cm⁴-4.0%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)367 cm³366 cm³+0.3%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)324 cm³324 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)284 cm⁴294 cm⁴-3.4%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)73.9 cm³73.1 cm³+1.1%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)2.69 cm2.79 cm-3.6%
Torsion constant (It)13 cm⁴9.68 cm⁴+34.3%

IPE 240 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; H-250x125x6x9-29.6 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-250x125x6x9-29.6.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, H-250x125x6x9-29.6 has the larger second moment of area: 4,052 cm⁴ against 3,890 cm⁴, a difference of 4.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, H-250x125x6x9-29.6 is the more efficient section: 12.4 against 12.0 cm³ per kg/m, 3.3% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

In short, IPE 240 is the stronger section and H-250x125x6x9-29.6 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. IPE 240 has a plastic modulus of 367 cm³ and H-250x125x6x9-29.6 has 366 cm³, a difference of only 0.3% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

H-250x125x6x9-29.6 at 29.6 kg/m, against 30.7 kg/m for the other - a saving of 3.7%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-250x125x6x9-29.6 gives 366 cm³ of plastic modulus and 4,052 cm⁴ of inertia against 367 cm³ and 3,890 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

H-250x125x6x9-29.6, with a second moment of area of 4,052 cm⁴ against 3,890 cm⁴ (4.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…