CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

IPE 500 vs S 20X66

IPE 500 is an IPE section from the European (Continental) range; S 20X66 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. S 20X66 carries more bending: 2277.8 cm³ of plastic modulus against 2190 cm³, 3.9% more. IPE 500 is the lighter of the two at 90.7 kg/m against 98.2 kg/m, a saving of 7.6% on steel weight. Both are about 504 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyIPE 500
IPE
S 20X66
S
Difference
Mass90.7 kg/m98.2 kg/m-7.6%
Depth500 mm508 mm-1.6%
Width200 mm159 mm+25.8%
Web thickness10.2 mm12.8 mm-20.3%
Flange thickness16 mm20.2 mm-20.8%
Area116 cm²125.2 cm²-7.3%
Second moment, major (Iy)48,200 cm⁴49,532 cm⁴-2.7%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,190 cm³2,277.8 cm³-3.9%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,930 cm³1,950.1 cm³-1.0%
Second moment, minor (Iz)2,140 cm⁴1,145 cm⁴+86.9%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)336 cm³252.36 cm³+33.1%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.31 cm3.02 cm+42.7%
Torsion constant (It)89.1 cm⁴149 cm⁴-40.2%

IPE 500 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; S 20X66 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to S 20X66.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, S 20X66 has the larger second moment of area: 49,532 cm⁴ against 48,200 cm⁴, a difference of 2.7%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, IPE 500 is the more efficient section: 24.1 against 23.2 cm³ per kg/m, 4.1% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: IPE 500 has 336 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 252.36 cm³, 33.1% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. IPE sections are specified to EN 10365 · Continental Steel and S to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 7.6% weight.

In short, S 20X66 is the stronger section and IPE 500 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

S 20X66 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 2277.8 cm³ against 2190 cm³ - 3.9% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

IPE 500 at 90.7 kg/m, against 98.2 kg/m for the other - a saving of 7.6%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: S 20X66 gives 2277.8 cm³ of plastic modulus and 49,532 cm⁴ of inertia against 2190 cm³ and 48,200 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (EN 10365 · Continental Steel and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

S 20X66, with a second moment of area of 49,532 cm⁴ against 48,200 cm⁴ (2.7% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

IPE 500 vs UB 457×191×98IPE 500 vs W 18X65IPE 500 vs H-500x200x10x16-89.6
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…