CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

PFC 260×75×28 vs PFC 260×75

PFC 260×75×28 is a PFC section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); PFC 260×75 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 328 cm³ against 328 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.0%. They weigh essentially the same, 27.6 kg/m and 27.6 kg/m. Both are about 260 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyPFC 260×75×28
PFC
PFC 260×75
PFC
Difference
Mass27.6 kg/m27.6 kg/msame
Depth260 mm260 mmsame
Width75 mm75 mmsame
Web thickness7 mm7 mmsame
Flange thickness12 mm12 mmsame
Area35.1 cm²35.1 cm²same
Second moment, major (Iy)3,620 cm⁴3,619 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)328 cm³328 cm³same
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)278 cm³278 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)185 cm⁴185 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)62 cm³62 cm³same
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)2.3 cm2.3 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)11.7 cm⁴11.7 cm⁴same

PFC 260×75×28 to BS EN 1993-1-1:2005 / BS 4-1:2005; PFC 260×75 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to PFC 260×75.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, PFC 260×75×28 has the larger second moment of area: 3,620 cm⁴ against 3,619 cm⁴, a difference of 0.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (11.9 against 11.9 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. PFC sections are specified to BS EN 1993-1-1:2005 / BS 4-1:2005 and PFC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. PFC 260×75×28 has a plastic modulus of 328 cm³ and PFC 260×75 has 328 cm³, a difference of only 0.0% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: PFC 260×75×28 is 27.6 kg/m and PFC 260×75 is 27.6 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: PFC 260×75 gives 328 cm³ of plastic modulus and 3,619 cm⁴ of inertia against 328 cm³ and 3,620 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 1993-1-1:2005 / BS 4-1:2005 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

PFC 260×75×28, with a second moment of area of 3,620 cm⁴ against 3,619 cm⁴ (0.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

PFC 260×75×28 vs C 10X20C 10X20 vs PFC 260×75
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…