CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

PFC 430×100×64 vs MC 18X42.7

PFC 430×100×64 is an PFC section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); MC 18X42.7 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1220 cm³ against 1230.7 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.9%. They weigh essentially the same, 64.4 kg/m and 63.5 kg/m. MC 18X42.7 is deeper, 457.2 mm against 430 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyPFC 430×100×64
PFC
MC 18X42.7
MC
Difference
Mass64.4 kg/m63.5 kg/m+1.4%
Depth430 mm457.2 mm-5.9%
Width100 mm100.3 mm-0.3%
Web thickness11 mm11.4 mm-3.5%
Flange thickness19 mm15.9 mm+19.5%
Area82.1 cm²81.3 cm²+1.0%
Second moment, major (Iy)21,900 cm⁴23,059 cm⁴-5.0%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,220 cm³1,230.7 cm³-0.9%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,020 cm³1,007.8 cm³+1.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)722 cm⁴595.2 cm⁴+21.3%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)176 cm³144.53 cm³+21.8%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)2.97 cm2.72 cm+9.2%
Torsion constant (It)63 cm⁴51.2 cm⁴+23.0%

PFC 430×100×64 to BS EN 1993-1-1:2005 / BS 4-1:2005; MC 18X42.7 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to MC 18X42.7.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, MC 18X42.7 has the larger second moment of area: 23,059 cm⁴ against 21,900 cm⁴, a difference of 5.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, MC 18X42.7 is the more efficient section: 19.4 against 18.9 cm³ per kg/m, 2.3% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: PFC 430×100×64 has 176 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 144.53 cm³, 21.8% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. PFC sections are specified to BS EN 1993-1-1:2005 / BS 4-1:2005 and MC to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. PFC 430×100×64 has a plastic modulus of 1220 cm³ and MC 18X42.7 has 1230.7 cm³, a difference of only 0.9% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: PFC 430×100×64 is 64.4 kg/m and MC 18X42.7 is 63.5 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: MC 18X42.7 gives 1230.7 cm³ of plastic modulus and 23,059 cm⁴ of inertia against 1220 cm³ and 21,900 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 1993-1-1:2005 / BS 4-1:2005 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

MC 18X42.7, with a second moment of area of 23,059 cm⁴ against 21,900 cm⁴ (5.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

PFC 430×100×64 vs PFC 430×100
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…