CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

PFC 430×100×64 vs PFC 430×100

PFC 430×100×64 is a PFC section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); PFC 430×100 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1220 cm³ against 1222 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.2%. They weigh essentially the same, 64.4 kg/m and 64.4 kg/m. Both are about 430 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyPFC 430×100×64
PFC
PFC 430×100
PFC
Difference
Mass64.4 kg/m64.4 kg/msame
Depth430 mm430 mmsame
Width100 mm100 mmsame
Web thickness11 mm11 mmsame
Flange thickness19 mm19 mmsame
Area82.1 cm²82.1 cm²same
Second moment, major (Iy)21,900 cm⁴21,940 cm⁴-0.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,220 cm³1,222 cm³-0.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,020 cm³1,020 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)722 cm⁴722 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)176 cm³176 cm³same
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)2.97 cm2.97 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)63 cm⁴63 cm⁴same

PFC 430×100×64 to BS EN 1993-1-1:2005 / BS 4-1:2005; PFC 430×100 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to PFC 430×100.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, PFC 430×100 has the larger second moment of area: 21,940 cm⁴ against 21,900 cm⁴, a difference of 0.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (18.9 against 19.0 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. PFC sections are specified to BS EN 1993-1-1:2005 / BS 4-1:2005 and PFC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. PFC 430×100×64 has a plastic modulus of 1220 cm³ and PFC 430×100 has 1222 cm³, a difference of only 0.2% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: PFC 430×100×64 is 64.4 kg/m and PFC 430×100 is 64.4 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: PFC 430×100 gives 1222 cm³ of plastic modulus and 21,940 cm⁴ of inertia against 1220 cm³ and 21,900 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 1993-1-1:2005 / BS 4-1:2005 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

PFC 430×100, with a second moment of area of 21,940 cm⁴ against 21,900 cm⁴ (0.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

PFC 430×100×64 vs MC 18X42.7
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…