RHS 180×60×8 vs RHS 175×100×6.4
RHS 180×60×8 is an RHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); RHS 175×100×6.4 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. RHS 180×60×8 carries more bending: 184 cm³ of plastic modulus against 180 cm³, 2.2% more. RHS 175×100×6.4 is the lighter of the two at 25.7 kg/m against 27.6 kg/m, a saving of 7.4% on steel weight. RHS 180×60×8 is deeper, 180 mm against 175 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.
| Property | RHS 180×60×8 RHS Hot-finished | RHS 175×100×6.4 RHS Cold-formed | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mass | 27.6 kg/m | 25.7 kg/m | +7.4% |
| Depth | 180 mm | 175 mm | +2.9% |
| Width | 60 mm | 100 mm | -40.0% |
| Web thickness | 0 mm | 0 mm | same |
| Flange thickness | 0 mm | 0 mm | same |
| Area | 35.2 cm² | 32.2 cm² | +9.3% |
| Second moment, major (Iy) | 1,240 cm⁴ | 1,260 cm⁴ | -1.6% |
| Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y) | 184 cm³ | 180 cm³ | +2.2% |
| Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y) | 138 cm³ | 144 cm³ | -4.2% |
| Second moment, minor (Iz) | 201 cm⁴ | 528 cm⁴ | -61.9% |
| Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z) | 80.4 cm³ | 122 cm³ | -34.1% |
| Radius of gyration, minor (iz) | 2.39 cm | 4.05 cm | -41.0% |
| Torsion constant (It) | 590 cm⁴ | 1,251 cm⁴ | -52.8% |
RHS 180×60×8 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; RHS 175×100×6.4 to EN 10219 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to RHS 175×100×6.4.
How to choose between them
On stiffness, RHS 175×100×6.4 has the larger second moment of area: 1,260 cm⁴ against 1,240 cm⁴, a difference of 1.6%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.
Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, RHS 175×100×6.4 is the more efficient section: 7.0 against 6.7 cm³ per kg/m, 4.8% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.
The two diverge much more about the minor axis: RHS 175×100×6.4 has 122 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 80.4 cm³, 34.1% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.
These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. RHS Hot-finished sections are specified to BS EN 10210-2:2006 and RHS Cold-formed to EN 10219 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 7.4% weight.
In short, RHS 180×60×8 is the stronger section and RHS 175×100×6.4 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.