CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

SHS 120×120×5 vs CF SHS 120×120×5

SHS 120×120×5 is an SHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF SHS 120×120×5 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). SHS 120×120×5 carries more bending: 97.6 cm³ of plastic modulus against 95.4 cm³, 2.3% more. They weigh essentially the same, 17.8 kg/m and 17.5 kg/m. Both are about 120 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertySHS 120×120×5
SHS Hot-finished
CF SHS 120×120×5
SHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass17.8 kg/m17.5 kg/m+1.7%
Depth120 mm120 mmsame
Width120 mm120 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area22.7 cm²22.4 cm²+1.3%
Second moment, major (Iy)498 cm⁴485 cm⁴+2.7%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)97.6 cm³95.4 cm³+2.3%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)83 cm³80.9 cm³+2.6%
Second moment, minor (Iz)498 cm⁴485 cm⁴+2.7%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)97.6 cm³95.4 cm³+2.3%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.68 cm4.66 cm+0.4%
Torsion constant (It)777 cm⁴778 cm⁴-0.1%

SHS 120×120×5 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF SHS 120×120×5 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF SHS 120×120×5.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, SHS 120×120×5 has the larger second moment of area: 498 cm⁴ against 485 cm⁴, a difference of 2.7%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (5.5 against 5.5 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

In short, SHS 120×120×5 is the stronger section and CF SHS 120×120×5 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

SHS 120×120×5 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 97.6 cm³ against 95.4 cm³ - 2.3% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: SHS 120×120×5 is 17.8 kg/m and CF SHS 120×120×5 is 17.5 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: CF SHS 120×120×5 gives 95.4 cm³ of plastic modulus and 485 cm⁴ of inertia against 97.6 cm³ and 498 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

SHS 120×120×5, with a second moment of area of 498 cm⁴ against 485 cm⁴ (2.7% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…