CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

SHS 140×140×7.1 vs SHS 150×150×6.3

SHS 140×140×7.1 is an SHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); SHS 150×150×6.3 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 184 cm³ against 185 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.5%. SHS 150×150×6.3 is the lighter of the two at 27.4 kg/m against 29.2 kg/m, a saving of 6.6% on steel weight. SHS 150×150×6.3 is deeper, 150 mm against 140 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertySHS 140×140×7.1
SHS Hot-finished
SHS 150×150×6.3
SHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass29.2 kg/m27.4 kg/m+6.6%
Depth140 mm150 mm-6.7%
Width140 mm150 mm-6.7%
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area37.2 cm²34.8 cm²+6.9%
Second moment, major (Iy)1,090 cm⁴1,174 cm⁴-7.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)184 cm³185 cm³-0.5%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)155 cm³156 cm³-0.6%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,090 cm⁴1,174 cm⁴-7.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)184 cm³185 cm³-0.5%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)5.4 cm5.8 cm-6.9%
Torsion constant (It)1,710 cm⁴1,922 cm⁴-11.0%

SHS 140×140×7.1 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; SHS 150×150×6.3 to EN 10219 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to SHS 150×150×6.3.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, SHS 150×150×6.3 has the larger second moment of area: 1,174 cm⁴ against 1,090 cm⁴, a difference of 7.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, SHS 150×150×6.3 is the more efficient section: 6.8 against 6.3 cm³ per kg/m, 6.7% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. SHS Hot-finished sections are specified to BS EN 10210-2:2006 and SHS Cold-formed to EN 10219 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 6.6% weight.

In short, SHS 150×150×6.3 is the stronger section and SHS 150×150×6.3 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. SHS 140×140×7.1 has a plastic modulus of 184 cm³ and SHS 150×150×6.3 has 185 cm³, a difference of only 0.5% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

SHS 150×150×6.3 at 27.4 kg/m, against 29.2 kg/m for the other - a saving of 6.6%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: SHS 150×150×6.3 gives 185 cm³ of plastic modulus and 1,174 cm⁴ of inertia against 184 cm³ and 1,090 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10210-2:2006 and EN 10219 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

SHS 150×150×6.3, with a second moment of area of 1,174 cm⁴ against 1,090 cm⁴ (7.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

SHS 140×140×7.1 vs CF SHS 140×140×8SHS 140×140×7.1 vs SHS 150×150×6SHS 150×150×6.3 vs CF SHS 140×140×8SHS 150×150×6.3 vs SHS 150×150×6.4
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…