CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

SHS 150×150×6.3 vs SHS 150×150×6.4

SHS 150×150×6.3 is an SHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); SHS 150×150×6.4 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. SHS 150×150×6.3 carries more bending: 192 cm³ of plastic modulus against 188 cm³, 2.1% more. They weigh essentially the same, 28.1 kg/m and 28.3 kg/m. Both are about 150 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertySHS 150×150×6.3
SHS Hot-finished
SHS 150×150×6.4
SHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass28.1 kg/m28.3 kg/m-0.7%
Depth150 mm150 mmsame
Width150 mm150 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area35.8 cm²35.4 cm²+1.1%
Second moment, major (Iy)1,220 cm⁴1,189 cm⁴+2.6%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)192 cm³188 cm³+2.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)163 cm³158 cm³+3.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,220 cm⁴1,189 cm⁴+2.6%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)192 cm³188 cm³+2.1%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)5.85 cm5.8 cm+0.9%
Torsion constant (It)1,910 cm⁴1,949 cm⁴-2.0%

SHS 150×150×6.3 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; SHS 150×150×6.4 to EN 10219 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to SHS 150×150×6.4.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, SHS 150×150×6.3 has the larger second moment of area: 1,220 cm⁴ against 1,189 cm⁴, a difference of 2.6%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, SHS 150×150×6.3 is the more efficient section: 6.8 against 6.6 cm³ per kg/m, 2.9% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. SHS Hot-finished sections are specified to BS EN 10210-2:2006 and SHS Cold-formed to EN 10219 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, SHS 150×150×6.3 is the stronger section and SHS 150×150×6.3 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

SHS 150×150×6.3 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 192 cm³ against 188 cm³ - 2.1% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: SHS 150×150×6.3 is 28.1 kg/m and SHS 150×150×6.4 is 28.3 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: SHS 150×150×6.4 gives 188 cm³ of plastic modulus and 1,189 cm⁴ of inertia against 192 cm³ and 1,220 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10210-2:2006 and EN 10219 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

SHS 150×150×6.3, with a second moment of area of 1,220 cm⁴ against 1,189 cm⁴ (2.6% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

SHS 140×140×7.1 vs SHS 150×150×6.3SHS 150×150×6.3 vs CF SHS 140×140×8
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…