CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

SHS 150×150×8.8 vs CF SHS 150×150×10

SHS 150×150×8.8 is an SHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF SHS 150×150×10 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). CF SHS 150×150×10 carries more bending: 269 cm³ of plastic modulus against 257 cm³, 4.5% more. SHS 150×150×8.8 is the lighter of the two at 38.4 kg/m against 41.3 kg/m, a saving of 7.0% on steel weight. Both are about 150 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertySHS 150×150×8.8
SHS Hot-finished
CF SHS 150×150×10
SHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass38.4 kg/m41.3 kg/m-7.0%
Depth150 mm150 mmsame
Width150 mm150 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area48.9 cm²52.6 cm²-7.0%
Second moment, major (Iy)1,610 cm⁴1,650 cm⁴-2.4%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)257 cm³269 cm³-4.5%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)214 cm³220 cm³-2.7%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,610 cm⁴1,650 cm⁴-2.4%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)257 cm³269 cm³-4.5%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)5.74 cm5.61 cm+2.3%
Torsion constant (It)2,550 cm⁴2,840 cm⁴-10.2%

SHS 150×150×8.8 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF SHS 150×150×10 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF SHS 150×150×10.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, CF SHS 150×150×10 has the larger second moment of area: 1,650 cm⁴ against 1,610 cm⁴, a difference of 2.4%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, SHS 150×150×8.8 is the more efficient section: 6.7 against 6.5 cm³ per kg/m, 2.8% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

In short, CF SHS 150×150×10 is the stronger section and SHS 150×150×8.8 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

CF SHS 150×150×10 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 269 cm³ against 257 cm³ - 4.5% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

SHS 150×150×8.8 at 38.4 kg/m, against 41.3 kg/m for the other - a saving of 7.0%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: CF SHS 150×150×10 gives 269 cm³ of plastic modulus and 1,650 cm⁴ of inertia against 257 cm³ and 1,610 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

CF SHS 150×150×10, with a second moment of area of 1,650 cm⁴ against 1,610 cm⁴ (2.4% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

SHS 150×150×8.8 vs SHS 150×150×9
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…