CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

SHS 200×200×6.3 vs CF SHS 200×200×6.3

SHS 200×200×6.3 is an SHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF SHS 200×200×6.3 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). SHS 200×200×6.3 carries more bending: 350 cm³ of plastic modulus against 341 cm³, 2.6% more. CF SHS 200×200×6.3 is the lighter of the two at 37.2 kg/m against 38 kg/m, a saving of 2.2% on steel weight. Both are about 200 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertySHS 200×200×6.3
SHS Hot-finished
CF SHS 200×200×6.3
SHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass38 kg/m37.2 kg/m+2.2%
Depth200 mm200 mmsame
Width200 mm200 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area48.4 cm²47.4 cm²+2.1%
Second moment, major (Iy)3,010 cm⁴2,920 cm⁴+3.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)350 cm³341 cm³+2.6%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)301 cm³292 cm³+3.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)3,010 cm⁴2,920 cm⁴+3.1%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)350 cm³341 cm³+2.6%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7.89 cm7.85 cm+0.5%
Torsion constant (It)4,650 cm⁴4,680 cm⁴-0.6%

SHS 200×200×6.3 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF SHS 200×200×6.3 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF SHS 200×200×6.3.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, SHS 200×200×6.3 has the larger second moment of area: 3,010 cm⁴ against 2,920 cm⁴, a difference of 3.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (9.2 against 9.2 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

In short, SHS 200×200×6.3 is the stronger section and CF SHS 200×200×6.3 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

SHS 200×200×6.3 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 350 cm³ against 341 cm³ - 2.6% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

CF SHS 200×200×6.3 at 37.2 kg/m, against 38 kg/m for the other - a saving of 2.2%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: CF SHS 200×200×6.3 gives 341 cm³ of plastic modulus and 2,920 cm⁴ of inertia against 350 cm³ and 3,010 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

SHS 200×200×6.3, with a second moment of area of 3,010 cm⁴ against 2,920 cm⁴ (3.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…