CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

SHS 250×250×10 vs CF SHS 250×250×10

SHS 250×250×10 is an SHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF SHS 250×250×10 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). SHS 250×250×10 carries more bending: 851 cm³ of plastic modulus against 822 cm³, 3.5% more. CF SHS 250×250×10 is the lighter of the two at 72.7 kg/m against 74.5 kg/m, a saving of 2.5% on steel weight. Both are about 250 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertySHS 250×250×10
SHS Hot-finished
CF SHS 250×250×10
SHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass74.5 kg/m72.7 kg/m+2.5%
Depth250 mm250 mmsame
Width250 mm250 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area94.9 cm²92.6 cm²+2.5%
Second moment, major (Iy)9,060 cm⁴8,710 cm⁴+4.0%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)851 cm³822 cm³+3.5%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)724 cm³697 cm³+3.9%
Second moment, minor (Iz)9,060 cm⁴8,710 cm⁴+4.0%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)851 cm³822 cm³+3.5%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)9.77 cm9.7 cm+0.7%
Torsion constant (It)14,100 cm⁴14,200 cm⁴-0.7%

SHS 250×250×10 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF SHS 250×250×10 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF SHS 250×250×10.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, SHS 250×250×10 has the larger second moment of area: 9,060 cm⁴ against 8,710 cm⁴, a difference of 4.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (11.4 against 11.3 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

In short, SHS 250×250×10 is the stronger section and CF SHS 250×250×10 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

SHS 250×250×10 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 851 cm³ against 822 cm³ - 3.5% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

CF SHS 250×250×10 at 72.7 kg/m, against 74.5 kg/m for the other - a saving of 2.5%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: CF SHS 250×250×10 gives 822 cm³ of plastic modulus and 8,710 cm⁴ of inertia against 851 cm³ and 9,060 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

SHS 250×250×10, with a second moment of area of 9,060 cm⁴ against 8,710 cm⁴ (4.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

SHS 260×260×8.8 vs CF SHS 250×250×10SHS 260×260×8.8 vs SHS 250×250×10SHS 260×260×8.8 vs SHS 250×250×10
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…