CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

SHS 250×250×12.5 vs SHS 254×254×12.7

SHS 250×250×12.5 is an SHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); SHS 254×254×12.7 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1040 cm³ against 1023 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.7%. They weigh essentially the same, 91.9 kg/m and 92.9 kg/m. Both are about 252 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertySHS 250×250×12.5
SHS Hot-finished
SHS 254×254×12.7
SHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass91.9 kg/m92.9 kg/m-1.1%
Depth250 mm254 mm-1.6%
Width250 mm254 mm-1.6%
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area117 cm²116 cm²+0.9%
Second moment, major (Iy)10,900 cm⁴10,830 cm⁴+0.6%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,040 cm³1,023 cm³+1.7%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)873 cm³853 cm³+2.3%
Second moment, minor (Iz)10,900 cm⁴10,830 cm⁴+0.6%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,040 cm³1,023 cm³+1.7%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)9.66 cm9.68 cm-0.2%
Torsion constant (It)17,200 cm⁴18,420 cm⁴-6.6%

SHS 250×250×12.5 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; SHS 254×254×12.7 to EN 10219 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to SHS 254×254×12.7.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, SHS 250×250×12.5 has the larger second moment of area: 10,900 cm⁴ against 10,830 cm⁴, a difference of 0.6%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, SHS 250×250×12.5 is the more efficient section: 11.3 against 11.0 cm³ per kg/m, 2.8% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. SHS Hot-finished sections are specified to BS EN 10210-2:2006 and SHS Cold-formed to EN 10219 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. SHS 250×250×12.5 has a plastic modulus of 1040 cm³ and SHS 254×254×12.7 has 1023 cm³, a difference of only 1.7% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: SHS 250×250×12.5 is 91.9 kg/m and SHS 254×254×12.7 is 92.9 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: SHS 254×254×12.7 gives 1023 cm³ of plastic modulus and 10,830 cm⁴ of inertia against 1040 cm³ and 10,900 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10210-2:2006 and EN 10219 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

SHS 250×250×12.5, with a second moment of area of 10,900 cm⁴ against 10,830 cm⁴ (0.6% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…