CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

SHS 250×250×8.8 vs SHS 250×250×9

SHS 250×250×8.8 is an SHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); SHS 250×250×9 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 758 cm³ against 750 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.1%. They weigh essentially the same, 66 kg/m and 66.5 kg/m. Both are about 250 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertySHS 250×250×8.8
SHS Hot-finished
SHS 250×250×9
SHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass66 kg/m66.5 kg/m-0.8%
Depth250 mm250 mmsame
Width250 mm250 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area84.1 cm²84 cm²+0.1%
Second moment, major (Iy)8,110 cm⁴7,984 cm⁴+1.6%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)758 cm³750 cm³+1.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)649 cm³639 cm³+1.6%
Second moment, minor (Iz)8,110 cm⁴7,984 cm⁴+1.6%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)758 cm³750 cm³+1.1%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)9.82 cm9.75 cm+0.7%
Torsion constant (It)12,600 cm⁴12,910 cm⁴-2.4%

SHS 250×250×8.8 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; SHS 250×250×9 to EN 10219 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to SHS 250×250×9.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, SHS 250×250×8.8 has the larger second moment of area: 8,110 cm⁴ against 7,984 cm⁴, a difference of 1.6%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (11.5 against 11.3 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. SHS Hot-finished sections are specified to BS EN 10210-2:2006 and SHS Cold-formed to EN 10219 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. SHS 250×250×8.8 has a plastic modulus of 758 cm³ and SHS 250×250×9 has 750 cm³, a difference of only 1.1% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: SHS 250×250×8.8 is 66 kg/m and SHS 250×250×9 is 66.5 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: SHS 250×250×9 gives 750 cm³ of plastic modulus and 7,984 cm⁴ of inertia against 758 cm³ and 8,110 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10210-2:2006 and EN 10219 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

SHS 250×250×8.8, with a second moment of area of 8,110 cm⁴ against 7,984 cm⁴ (1.6% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

SHS 250×250×8.8 vs SHS 260×260×8SHS 260×260×8 vs SHS 250×250×9
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…