CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

SHS 350×350×12.5 vs CF SHS 350×350×12.5

SHS 350×350×12.5 is an SHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF SHS 350×350×12.5 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). SHS 350×350×12.5 carries more bending: 2110 cm³ of plastic modulus against 2020 cm³, 4.5% more. CF SHS 350×350×12.5 is the lighter of the two at 127 kg/m against 131 kg/m, a saving of 3.1% on steel weight. Both are about 350 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertySHS 350×350×12.5
SHS Hot-finished
CF SHS 350×350×12.5
SHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass131 kg/m127 kg/m+3.1%
Depth350 mm350 mmsame
Width350 mm350 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area167 cm²162 cm²+3.1%
Second moment, major (Iy)31,500 cm⁴30,000 cm⁴+5.0%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,110 cm³2,020 cm³+4.5%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,800 cm³1,720 cm³+4.7%
Second moment, minor (Iz)31,500 cm⁴30,000 cm⁴+5.0%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)2,110 cm³2,020 cm³+4.5%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)13.7 cm13.6 cm+0.7%
Torsion constant (It)48,900 cm⁴49,400 cm⁴-1.0%

SHS 350×350×12.5 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF SHS 350×350×12.5 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF SHS 350×350×12.5.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, SHS 350×350×12.5 has the larger second moment of area: 31,500 cm⁴ against 30,000 cm⁴, a difference of 5.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (16.1 against 15.9 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

In short, SHS 350×350×12.5 is the stronger section and CF SHS 350×350×12.5 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

SHS 350×350×12.5 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 2110 cm³ against 2020 cm³ - 4.5% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

CF SHS 350×350×12.5 at 127 kg/m, against 131 kg/m for the other - a saving of 3.1%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: CF SHS 350×350×12.5 gives 2020 cm³ of plastic modulus and 30,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 2110 cm³ and 31,500 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

SHS 350×350×12.5, with a second moment of area of 31,500 cm⁴ against 30,000 cm⁴ (5.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…