CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

SHS 400×400×10 vs CF SHS 400×400×10

SHS 400×400×10 is an SHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF SHS 400×400×10 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). SHS 400×400×10 carries more bending: 2260 cm³ of plastic modulus against 2210 cm³, 2.3% more. They weigh essentially the same, 122 kg/m and 120 kg/m. Both are about 400 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertySHS 400×400×10
SHS Hot-finished
CF SHS 400×400×10
SHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass122 kg/m120 kg/m+1.7%
Depth400 mm400 mmsame
Width400 mm400 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area155 cm²153 cm²+1.3%
Second moment, major (Iy)39,100 cm⁴38,200 cm⁴+2.4%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,260 cm³2,210 cm³+2.3%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,960 cm³1,910 cm³+2.6%
Second moment, minor (Iz)39,100 cm⁴38,200 cm⁴+2.4%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)2,260 cm³2,210 cm³+2.3%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)15.9 cm15.8 cm+0.6%
Torsion constant (It)60,100 cm⁴60,400 cm⁴-0.5%

SHS 400×400×10 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF SHS 400×400×10 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF SHS 400×400×10.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, SHS 400×400×10 has the larger second moment of area: 39,100 cm⁴ against 38,200 cm⁴, a difference of 2.4%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (18.5 against 18.4 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

In short, SHS 400×400×10 is the stronger section and CF SHS 400×400×10 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

SHS 400×400×10 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 2260 cm³ against 2210 cm³ - 2.3% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: SHS 400×400×10 is 122 kg/m and CF SHS 400×400×10 is 120 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: CF SHS 400×400×10 gives 2210 cm³ of plastic modulus and 38,200 cm⁴ of inertia against 2260 cm³ and 39,100 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

SHS 400×400×10, with a second moment of area of 39,100 cm⁴ against 38,200 cm⁴ (2.4% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…