CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

SHS 40×40×3.6 vs SHS 40×40×4

SHS 40×40×3.6 is an SHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); SHS 40×40×4 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 6.88 cm³ against 7.01 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.9%. SHS 40×40×3.6 is the lighter of the two at 4.01 kg/m against 4.2 kg/m, a saving of 4.5% on steel weight. Both are about 40 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertySHS 40×40×3.6
SHS Hot-finished
SHS 40×40×4
SHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass4 kg/m4.2 kg/m-4.5%
Depth40 mm40 mmsame
Width40 mm40 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area5.1 cm²5.3 cm²-4.7%
Second moment, major (Iy)11.1 cm⁴11.1 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)6.88 cm³7.01 cm³-1.9%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)5.54 cm³5.54 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)11.1 cm⁴11.1 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)6.88 cm³7.01 cm³-1.9%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)1.47 cm1.44 cm+2.1%
Torsion constant (It)18.1 cm⁴19.4 cm⁴-6.7%

SHS 40×40×3.6 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; SHS 40×40×4 to EN 10219 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to SHS 40×40×4.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, SHS 40×40×4 has the larger second moment of area: 11.1 cm⁴ against 11.1 cm⁴, a difference of 0.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, SHS 40×40×3.6 is the more efficient section: 1.7 against 1.7 cm³ per kg/m, 2.8% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. SHS Hot-finished sections are specified to BS EN 10210-2:2006 and SHS Cold-formed to EN 10219 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 4.5% weight.

In short, SHS 40×40×4 is the stronger section and SHS 40×40×3.6 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. SHS 40×40×3.6 has a plastic modulus of 6.88 cm³ and SHS 40×40×4 has 7.01 cm³, a difference of only 1.9% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

SHS 40×40×3.6 at 4.01 kg/m, against 4.2 kg/m for the other - a saving of 4.5%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: SHS 40×40×4 gives 7.01 cm³ of plastic modulus and 11.1 cm⁴ of inertia against 6.88 cm³ and 11.1 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10210-2:2006 and EN 10219 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

SHS 40×40×4, with a second moment of area of 11.1 cm⁴ against 11.1 cm⁴ (0.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

SHS 40×40×3.6 vs CF SHS 40×40×4SHS 40×40×4 vs CF SHS 40×40×4
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…