CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

SHS 40×40×4 vs CF SHS 40×40×4

SHS 40×40×4 is an SHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF SHS 40×40×4 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). SHS 40×40×4 carries more bending: 7.44 cm³ of plastic modulus against 7.01 cm³, 6.1% more. CF SHS 40×40×4 is the lighter of the two at 4.2 kg/m against 4.39 kg/m, a saving of 4.5% on steel weight. Both are about 40 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertySHS 40×40×4
SHS Hot-finished
CF SHS 40×40×4
SHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass4.4 kg/m4.2 kg/m+4.5%
Depth40 mm40 mmsame
Width40 mm40 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area5.6 cm²5.3 cm²+4.5%
Second moment, major (Iy)11.8 cm⁴11.1 cm⁴+6.3%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)7.44 cm³7.01 cm³+6.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)5.91 cm³5.54 cm³+6.7%
Second moment, minor (Iz)11.8 cm⁴11.1 cm⁴+6.3%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)7.44 cm³7.01 cm³+6.1%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)1.45 cm1.44 cm+0.7%
Torsion constant (It)19.5 cm⁴19.4 cm⁴+0.5%

SHS 40×40×4 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF SHS 40×40×4 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF SHS 40×40×4.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, SHS 40×40×4 has the larger second moment of area: 11.8 cm⁴ against 11.1 cm⁴, a difference of 6.3%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (1.7 against 1.7 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

In short, SHS 40×40×4 is the stronger section and CF SHS 40×40×4 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

SHS 40×40×4 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 7.44 cm³ against 7.01 cm³ - 6.1% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

CF SHS 40×40×4 at 4.2 kg/m, against 4.39 kg/m for the other - a saving of 4.5%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: CF SHS 40×40×4 gives 7.01 cm³ of plastic modulus and 11.1 cm⁴ of inertia against 7.44 cm³ and 11.8 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

SHS 40×40×4, with a second moment of area of 11.8 cm⁴ against 11.1 cm⁴ (6.3% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

SHS 40×40×3.6 vs CF SHS 40×40×4SHS 40×40×3.6 vs SHS 40×40×4
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…