CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

SHS 70×70×3.2 vs SHS 70×70×3

SHS 70×70×3.2 is an SHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); SHS 70×70×3 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. SHS 70×70×3.2 carries more bending: 21 cm³ of plastic modulus against 19.9 cm³, 5.5% more. SHS 70×70×3 is the lighter of the two at 6.28 kg/m against 6.63 kg/m, a saving of 5.6% on steel weight. Both are about 70 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertySHS 70×70×3.2
SHS Hot-finished
SHS 70×70×3
SHS
Difference
Mass6.6 kg/m6.3 kg/m+5.6%
Depth70 mm70 mmsame
Width70 mm70 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area8.4 cm²7.9 cm²+6.3%
Second moment, major (Iy)62.3 cm⁴59 cm⁴+5.6%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)21 cm³19.9 cm³+5.5%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)17.8 cm³16.9 cm³+5.3%
Second moment, minor (Iz)62.3 cm⁴59 cm⁴+5.6%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)21 cm³19.9 cm³+5.5%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)2.72 cm2.73 cm-0.4%
Torsion constant (It)97.6 cm⁴92 cm⁴+6.1%

SHS 70×70×3.2 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; SHS 70×70×3 to EN 10219 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to SHS 70×70×3.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, SHS 70×70×3.2 has the larger second moment of area: 62.3 cm⁴ against 59 cm⁴, a difference of 5.6%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (3.2 against 3.2 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. SHS Hot-finished sections are specified to BS EN 10210-2:2006 and SHS to EN 10219 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 5.6% weight.

In short, SHS 70×70×3.2 is the stronger section and SHS 70×70×3 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

SHS 70×70×3.2 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 21 cm³ against 19.9 cm³ - 5.5% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

SHS 70×70×3 at 6.28 kg/m, against 6.63 kg/m for the other - a saving of 5.6%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: SHS 70×70×3 gives 19.9 cm³ of plastic modulus and 59 cm⁴ of inertia against 21 cm³ and 62.3 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10210-2:2006 and EN 10219 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

SHS 70×70×3.2, with a second moment of area of 62.3 cm⁴ against 59 cm⁴ (5.6% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

SHS 70×70×3 vs CF SHS 70×70×3SHS 70×70×3.2 vs CF SHS 70×70×3.5SHS 70×70×3.2 vs SHS 65×65×4
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…