CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 203×102×23 vs IPE AA 220

UB 203×102×23 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); IPE AA 220 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 234 cm³ against 230 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.7%. IPE AA 220 is the lighter of the two at 21.2 kg/m against 23.1 kg/m, a saving of 9.0% on steel weight. IPE AA 220 is deeper, 216.4 mm against 203.2 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 203×102×23
UB
IPE AA 220
IPE
Difference
Mass23.1 kg/m21.2 kg/m+9.0%
Depth203.2 mm216.4 mm-6.1%
Width101.8 mm110 mm-7.5%
Web thickness5.4 mm4.7 mm+14.9%
Flange thickness9.3 mm7.4 mm+25.7%
Area29.4 cm²27 cm²+8.9%
Second moment, major (Iy)2,100 cm⁴2,220 cm⁴-5.4%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)234 cm³230 cm³+1.7%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)207 cm³205 cm³+1.0%
Second moment, minor (Iz)164 cm⁴165 cm⁴-0.6%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)49.7 cm³46.5 cm³+6.9%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)2.36 cm2.47 cm-4.5%
Torsion constant (It)7.02 cm⁴5.06 cm⁴+38.7%

UB 203×102×23 to BS EN 10365:2017; IPE AA 220 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to IPE AA 220.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, IPE AA 220 has the larger second moment of area: 2,220 cm⁴ against 2,100 cm⁴, a difference of 5.4%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, IPE AA 220 is the more efficient section: 10.8 against 10.1 cm³ per kg/m, 6.6% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and IPE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 9.0% weight.

In short, UB 203×102×23 is the stronger section and IPE AA 220 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 203×102×23 has a plastic modulus of 234 cm³ and IPE AA 220 has 230 cm³, a difference of only 1.7% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

IPE AA 220 at 21.2 kg/m, against 23.1 kg/m for the other - a saving of 9.0%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: IPE AA 220 gives 230 cm³ of plastic modulus and 2,220 cm⁴ of inertia against 234 cm³ and 2,100 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

IPE AA 220, with a second moment of area of 2,220 cm⁴ against 2,100 cm⁴ (5.4% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 203×102×23 vs W 8X15
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…