CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 203×133×30 vs S 8X23

UB 203×133×30 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); S 8X23 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 314 cm³ against 314.63 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.2%. UB 203×133×30 is the lighter of the two at 30 kg/m against 34.2 kg/m, a saving of 12.3% on steel weight. Both are about 205 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 203×133×30
UB
S 8X23
S
Difference
Mass30 kg/m34.2 kg/m-12.3%
Depth206.8 mm203.2 mm+1.8%
Width133.9 mm105.9 mm+26.4%
Web thickness6.4 mm11.2 mm-42.9%
Flange thickness9.6 mm10.8 mm-11.1%
Area38.2 cm²43.6 cm²-12.4%
Second moment, major (Iy)2,900 cm⁴2,693 cm⁴+7.7%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)314 cm³314.63 cm³-0.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)280 cm³265.47 cm³+5.5%
Second moment, minor (Iz)385 cm⁴177.7 cm⁴+116.7%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)88.2 cm³60.141 cm³+46.7%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.17 cm2.02 cm+56.9%
Torsion constant (It)10.3 cm⁴22.89 cm⁴-55.0%

UB 203×133×30 to BS EN 10365:2017; S 8X23 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to S 8X23.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 203×133×30 has the larger second moment of area: 2,900 cm⁴ against 2,693 cm⁴, a difference of 7.7%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, UB 203×133×30 is the more efficient section: 10.5 against 9.2 cm³ per kg/m, 13.8% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: UB 203×133×30 has 88.2 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 60.141 cm³, 46.7% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and S to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 12.3% weight.

In short, S 8X23 is the stronger section and UB 203×133×30 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 203×133×30 has a plastic modulus of 314 cm³ and S 8X23 has 314.63 cm³, a difference of only 0.2% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

UB 203×133×30 at 30 kg/m, against 34.2 kg/m for the other - a saving of 12.3%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: S 8X23 gives 314.63 cm³ of plastic modulus and 2,693 cm⁴ of inertia against 314 cm³ and 2,900 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 203×133×30, with a second moment of area of 2,900 cm⁴ against 2,693 cm⁴ (7.7% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 203×133×30 vs H-200x150x6x9-30.6
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…